tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15931300.post2314677924086013745..comments2008-07-30T14:33:22.065-05:00Collin Lylehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01152403631617973948noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15931300.post-40597967037812202302008-07-30T14:33:00.000-05:002008-07-30T14:33:00.000-05:00I know you think it's just a piece of paper, but, the kids are having trouble explaining our relationship. "He's daddies wrestling partner" just isn't cutting it anymore.Collin Lylehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01152403631617973948noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15931300.post-82240959008125615222008-07-30T14:07:00.000-05:002008-07-30T14:07:00.000-05:00No matter what the outcome, I am NOT going to marry you big boy.Bill Hippshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12247612608786215912noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-15931300.post-43041706237476208052008-05-18T09:57:00.000-05:002008-05-18T09:57:00.000-05:00Worst case scenario: if the anti-gay marriage folks get a 'constitutional amendment proposal' on the ballot this fall, they will load up the voting booths with conservatives and even some moderates or independents who will also place a vote for McCain while they're at it. It becomes like Ohio in 2004, tipping crucial state towards the Repubs.<BR/><BR/>Best case scenario: Obama stands up in California and defends gay marriage. He stands with Gov. Schwarzenegger and says the government doesn't have the right to prevent two adults from getting married. He also reminds people of the 'tyranny of the majority.' And that just because more people in California are against gay marriage, doesn't mean it's right to change the state's constitution to ban it.<BR/><BR/>Obama then goes on to remind the people of California, that had the legality of slavery been put to the popular vote a few hundred years ago -- or the legality of Jim Crow put to the vote in the 1940s -- both would have passed.BadWimshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03469604157747988483noreply@blogger.com